The concept of a National Adviser Conference works well, we think, so we were delighted to hear that the IFA and PAA are planning another joint conference. But I am conscious that our view is focused on being able to reach and talk with a large group of advisers all at the same time. You might have different priorities. So please drop me a line if you have a strong opinion on whether there should or should not be a joint conference. Link.
Follow Chatswood Consulting and Quality Product Research on LinkedIn to stay up to date with all the industry news.
Apparently eating an insect would be preferable to talking about insurance for 6% of 20 to 30 year-olds (in the United States). So this robo-advice site in Australia knows it has its work cut out for it. Link.
Rob Stock has this article attacking 'money for nothing' payments on trail commissions on products where the adviser no longer has the right to advise on a product. Link.
When this issue was first raised in Goodreturns last year I had several advisers approach me pointing out that the financial agreement between the investment or insurance company and the adviser was made years ago, and never included a stipulation that investment advice would be given. So, they say, 'what has the financial contract got to do with the current situation?'
Rob Stock suggests it might cut prices:
"The costs of insurance could drop if calls to end 'money-for-nothing' annual commission payments to financial advisers who are no longer providing advice or service to clients are successful."
But it is very unlikely.
The number of products in the category being discussed is tiny. To provide some context, the premium in the affected category is between $80 million and $110 million, but this pales by comparison with the 1.986 billion not affected (Public FSC summary statistics to 30 June 2015).
Some of those old products are on ancient computer systems which cost a lot to maintain - when costs are properly allocated they may be making losses. I doubt very much that there would be much movement in actual premiums even for the specific products, let alone insurance in general.
Asteron Life has put together a great series of videos highlighting people overcoming difficulty to achieve their goals, as with this promotion:
Via Insurance Business Online, apparently some actuaries have been busy contemplating the Rugby, and have come up with odds on an All Black win. Although my heart yearns to agree with them, my heads says that when we get into the late stages of the tournament anything can happen. Link.
The Economist has this on why nutritional supplements may be useless. Link. This is a timely reminder about the budget issue. Since so much spending is, in practice, discretionary the challenge is to prove relative value, against other items in the budget.
Here is a look at how cancer affects people differently depending on where they live. Official WHO 2014 data is used and contains country by country rankings with charts and maps for all the leading cancers.
The Independent in the UK has an excellent article on the value of income protection insurance. I think the title says it all:
'It's the difference between make or break if you find you can't work'
But here is another great quote, which includes my personal minimum baseline for an effective insurance package:
"More awareness raising is needed to show people what a difference this sort of cover can make. It often means the difference between keeping or losing the family home or getting access to the best care and support," Mr Hamilton warned
Insurance has a measurable effect if you got to keep the house. If you got paid out a bit but still lost the house I think that is a fail.
Asteron Life launched “Lifesnap” a questionnaire designed to help a client think about their financial risk protection priorities before meeting an adviser. It is a really interesting idea reflecting the discovery that online search often precedes offline purchase. Link here.
This is an initiative aimed at clients in support of advisers, as they say on the site:
You are unique. That's why off-the-shelf insurance might not fit you.
Talking to an adviser will help you focus on what's important to you, and it's even more effective with a little preparation. LifeSnap can help you with that.